法治風暴的陰霾

The permanent judges of the Court of Final Appeal Bokhary haze before the storm of the rule of law, within the meaning of retirement conversation that is the interpretation of the National People's Congress in violation of the Basic Law provides for procedures for Hong Kong. Ms Leung said that to solve the double non-issue by the Chief Executive to the National People's Congress drew the interpretation of the Basic Law, the SAR Government and human pro-establishment, also suspected to be in the way of judicial review, there are tens of interpretation of the Basic Law to override the Hong Kong courts earlier, such a proposition, Mrs Regina Ip The unprecedented ferocity trend. 
The Basic one hundred fifty-eight provides, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress authorizes the Hong Kong court on the scope of the terms of the autonomy of Hong Kong Basic Law, "to interpret on their own. Hong Kong approach the NPCSC interpretation two conditions: First, the scope is limited to national defense and foreign affairs, or the terms of the relationship between the Central Authorities and the HKSAR, the program drew to the National People's Congress, and only by the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal. Therefore, Bokhary said: "outside the CFA offered other interpretation is wrong." In other words, in addition to the Congo case, all interpretation is wrong. 
This is to comply with the interpretation of the rule of law. Ms Elsie Leung, is being formed to override the rule of law in Hong Kong to Communist China's rule of man storm haze. The Li Yi Every Monday to Friday published 

終院常任法官包致金在退休談話中提到法治風暴前的陰霾，所指就是人大違反《基本法》規定程序對香港的釋法。梁愛詩說解決雙非問題可由行政長官向人大提請釋法，早前葉劉淑儀也如此主張，特區政府和建制派中人，也嫌司法覆核礙手礙腳，確有想動輒以釋法來凌駕香港法院的「前所未有的凶猛之勢」。
《基本法》一五八條規定，人大常委會授權香港法院對《基本法》有關香港自治範圍的條款自行解釋。香港提請人大常委釋法有兩個條件：一是範圍，只限國防外交或中央與特區關係的條款，二是程序，只能由香港終院向人大提請。因此，包致金說：「終院主動提出以外，其他釋法都是錯誤。」也就是說，除了「剛果案」之外，過去所有的釋法都是錯的。
這是遵從法治的詮釋。梁愛詩等則正在形成以中共的人治凌駕香港法治的風暴陰霾。

李怡